Sunday, April 21, 2013

My son, the Eagle Scout

Armed and dangerous!
Finished product 
This past weekend marked a huge milestone for our family, as my son, Braxton, completed his Eagle Scout project! He and his friends (with the help of Mom and Dad) built some beautiful shelving units for the Walton Cheerleaders' storage closet. It was a lot of fun and very tiring, but the fruit of all the hard work makes it worthwhile. God made everything easy and uneventful - we had all the tools, supplies, manpower, food (very important!), adult help and supervision, no injuries, no ill tempers, the gym area was cleared all weekend so we didn't have to compete with basketball, the weather was cool, etc. And, most importantly, we got it all done in two days! Celebration time! Congratulations, Braxton! Job well done!
Before
Buck -  a lifesaver with all his tools!

Snack table
Dad
Girl Power!
Planning

Riding the surf







Monday, April 15, 2013

Mission Trip to the Dominican Republic



 My two youngest children just returned from a week of missions in the Dominican Republic. I love seeing these pictures of them holding and loving on these little children who are so deprived of one on one contact and special attention. It's a wonderful time for them to walk out their faith and share it with others. A lot of spiritual growth occurs, and these young people have an opportunity to make their faith in Jesus Christ their own, separate from their parents. Also, they have a chance to put religion and denominationalism aside and let God do a personal, unique work in them! My husband went as well and had some wonderful testimonies to share. It was a spiritual high for everyone. I'm a happy wife and a happy mom!



Tuesday, April 9, 2013

A Tribute to Roger Ebert

Roger Ebert circa 1970 - courtesy of Wikipedia
This week marks the passing of a very important person in Hollywood: Roger Ebert, my favorite film critic from The Chicago Sun Times. When I first became an avid movie-goer and lover of film, I couldn't wait for the weekly movie reviews espoused by him and his fellow film critic, Gene Siskel of The Chicago Tribune. Their partnership began in the early 80s and continued on in the 90s with a thirty minute show called Siskel & Ebert. It was great fun to see these two feisty movie critics duke it out over whether a picture should receive a thumbs up or down, thereby affecting its fate at the box office. I was a bit envious, wishing I could chuck the corporate grind and watch movies for a living, pondering the stories and characters, dissecting the motivations behind the structure and tone, identifying important imagery that told the story more than dialogue or plot.

Today, I am privileged to write a monthly column in christianfictiononlinemagazine.com where I am able to share my love for the movies--not unlike Siskel and Ebert. While my approach may be different, in that I only recommend and critique movies I like, the passion for story drives me in a similar way. Being in the film industry, I know how difficult it is to get a movie made, so I refuse to bash another's years of sacrifice, sweat, and toil. Statistics say the average time to get a film from script to screen is five years, but in my experience, that seems way too short!

Sadly, Gene Siskel died years ago, leaving Roger Ebert to go it alone. I didn't always agree with Ebert's  critiques, but I embraced his gusto for story, character, conflict--buzz words in the screenwriting world. Hollywood (and especially independent filmmakers) can't help but appreciate the person who lives for the movies, waiting with great anticipation for the next film to be released, whether it be a drama, comedy, romance, horror, indie pic, noir, avant-garde, documentary, or silent film. Like a connoisseur of gourmet food or fine wine, Ebert was that person; he seemed to view films as a wonderful smorgasbord of fantasy and make-believe where one could tuck in for several hours and come away disgusted, complacent, bored, or satiated with excitement, but wanting more, regardless of the experience. He was a customer with refined tastes who didn't mind reveling in lowbrow every now and again, showing his true appreciation for the craft and art of film making. The industry will miss him (whether they care to admit it or not) as will the public.

With the growth of technology and the Internet, I don't know if Ebert's influence on the box office will be replaced, which may be a good thing. For me, his legacy isn't as a film cop who protected my hard earned money from bad movies, but rather the importance he gave to film in general. He legitimized my love for story and movies, making it a sophisticated topic of conversation for like-minded individuals labeled by some as "day-dreamers." Essentially, he brought movie making to the masses, presenting it as a craft to study and learn from, an art form that has the potential to move the soul, sway the heart, and conform the mind. He took movies seriously and made a living enjoying them, talking about them, and getting others to do likewise. What a wonderful and unusual gift he was given.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

At the Movies - Lincoln


Several months ago, I saw Stephen Spielberg’s Academy Award nominated, Lincoln, but chose to wait until after Oscar night to give my review. Mainly, I wanted to see if Daniel Day-Lewis made history by being the only man to win the prize for Best Actor three times. With a splendid performance, complete with hunched shoulders and spindly stature, Day-Lewis did make history. He gives a fresh rendering of the great man, combining fragility with strength that made me reaffirm Abraham Lincoln as my favorite US President.   

The focus of the film is the period before the close of the Civil War where Lincoln is in a political battle to secure the end of slavery. It is the dilemma surrounding the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment that drives the story. National support is based on the belief that the end of slavery will hasten the end of the war, but if peace is negotiated, then that support might wane for fear of what a mass of free slaves might do to an already weak economy. Lincoln realizes he has a short window of time to garner support for the Amendment and have it ratified before the war comes to a close. Others around him, both Confederate and Union, realize the same thing, which sets up a political chess game that is quite enthralling. To Lincoln, this is a game which must be won at all costs. In his opinion, slavery must be cut off at the head, with absolutely no possibility of being resurrected.

Immediately, our tall, lanky, somewhat strange-looking sixteenth president becomes a hero with a mission. We know its outcome, but the ride he takes is what entertains. The politics and lobbying involved are fascinating and revealed my ignorance of American history. At every turn, there is opposition that weighs heavily on Lincoln’s soul, particularly from his wife, Mary Todd, who is played by Sally Field in one of her best roles since Norma Rae. Watching her rail on her husband, hurling one accusation after another, feigning mental anguish and throwing child-like tantrums made me feel like the world’s best wife. After reading about how much Lincoln adored her, despite her mental instability, I gained even more respect for the man.

With the fate of the Amendment riding on the House of Representatives, Lincoln launches a campaign to secure votes. He hires three bumbling lobbyists (James Spader, John Hawkes, and Time Blake Nelson) to solicit support from lame duck House members, promising cushy jobs in the newly reformed government. Think The Three Stooges stuck in the 1860s, minus Moe’s bowl haircut. My favorite was Spader, who looked a little rounder and less handsome than what I remembered from his ‘80 and ‘90s romance films. He added great humor to the movie which lightened the intensity of the drama.

I’ll spare you the additional political intrigue, other than to say the foundation of the Amendment’s support lies with the movie’s most colorful character, Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones). Stevens is a radical, abolitionist member of the Republican Party whose tongue and wit are as sharp as the swords being swung on the battlefield. Watching him duel retorts with his opponents in the House is a wondrous sight to behold. How I would love to go back in time and be a fly on the wall, watching one of the most important battles in our history take place in the halls of the nation’s capital. The role couldn’t have been better cast than with Tommy Lee Jones. I believe he is one of America’s greatest actors.

The best parts of the movie were the gentle, tender moments with Lincoln’s little son, Tad. I teared up at seeing the tired, worn-out head of state kneel to the floor and allow the sleepy boy to climb on his back and head to bed after a long day. It provided a nice glimpse of the human side of the loving father. Also, there were great jokes and stories with deep philosophical morals that showcased the president’s raconteur abilities and vast intellectual brain power. I don’t think I’ll ever hear the term “Euclid’s Triangle” without seeing Daniel Day-Lewis wrapped in an old blanket explaining the simple truths of life to two young soldiers.

The race to secure enough support in the House builds to a nice climax, leaving the viewer on the edge of his or her seat. Lincoln uses power, delays, intervention, and persuasion to succeed—by just two votes. Finally, the Thirteenth Amendment is ratified and slavery ends, with the war coming to a close several months later at Appomattox Court House. But sadly, the end of the Civil War marks the end of one of our country’s greatest leaders.


*** SPOILER ALERT ***

I wasn’t wild about the final scene where Lincoln seemed to be deified as he delivered his second inaugural address. The image of him being regaled as a god left me a little unsettled— he was a human being with flaws like all of us. But overall the movie was emotional, informative, and entertaining.

A final note: I loved how the filmmakers threw in a very important social commentary toward the end of the movie that still causes dissention amongst some old-line Southerners—interracial marriage. When Thaddeus Stevens takes a copy of the ratified Amendment home, he presents it to his black housekeeper, who turns out to be more than a cook and cleaner. As he slips into bed, she is there next to him, referred to as his “darling.” Very well-placed and strategic in its revelation of Steven’s character. Nicely and cleverly done, Mr. Spielberg!

Lincoln is a movie “for the ages.” Add it to your home collection and enjoy great acting and directing and a terrific story where one steps into the final days of the great Abraham Lincoln.